In The Case for Reparations, Ta-Nehisi Coates addresses the controversial topic of slavery by arguing that descendants of slaves should receive the reparations needed to sustain everything that this country has done to their ancestors. He starts off the essay with a living person, Clyde Ross, who is suffering with his mortgage because of the racist system that has been created for him. By putting a living face to the issue of slavery, Coates personalizes the essay right off the bat, allowing readers to see the problem not just as a general old issue, for the issue affects living people like Clyde each and every day. The added sympathy, pathos, and attention gained by this opening story allows both Coates and the audience to be on the same playing field, and talk about a person who desperately needed help.
Coates then uses various research, historical content, pictures, and old documents to bring the ethos to the table and fully defend his argument, so that the people who are about to criticize him at least see the reasons and the articulations behind what he has to offer. There are various references to laws and acts that have discriminated African Americans, and by noting them, he adds more legitimacy than ever before.
His main argument through the essay is that reparations are a MUST in order for this country to pay its dues and open up to more inclusion and diversity. Like Coates says, it’s like not paying the debt on your credit card. It needs to be done or the money will continue to pile up until it is not worth it anymore. He asks white people to acknowledge the position that they are in, and know it is based on the participation of America benefitting from slavery. Theft has been committed, and by articulating it in a way that touches on all points, he allows his criticizers to gain a different perspective than they originally had.



